The Grenville tragedy in June 2017 resulted in Dam Judith Hackett’s independent review of building and fire safety regulations published in May 2018. This has resulted in a comprehensive review of UK building safety regulations and a set of initiatives to define the competency requirements of those who work in or in tall buildings. Hazards (HRBs). The Building Safety Bill, whose draft has been subject to prior scrutiny by the Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee, will make its way through the parliamentary process into becoming law during 2021. Within the bill, there are a number of proposals to enhance the accountability of those who own and manage high-risk buildings, and there is a focus. The efficiency of those who work in or in high-risk buildings is undeniable. NAPIT has created an informational infographic showing the focus on efficiency and an overview of the current state of work being done within the industry for safety building reform. It refers to a number of industry initiatives currently examining how to determine the competency of those who work in high-risk buildings, and it also outlines 5 basic principles for identifying and monitoring the competence of those who work in or on HR boards: Sector-specific competency requirements for those working in or in HRBs must It is agreed and approved globally; the competency of those working alone or unsupervised in or in HRBs should be technically assessed and routinely re-evaluated by a UKAS accredited accrediting body. Monitoring and Recording All employees of or in HRB must have certified fire safety training in buildings An independently proprietary digital record must be established, which lists organizations and individuals deemed qualified to work in or in HRBs Commentary on the chart, Frank Bertie President of the National Association of Professional Inspectors and Examiners said the Snippets: “We created this graph to provide a clear and concise overview of the work currently underway within the industry to identify competency requirements for those working in high-risk buildings. It is clear that enhanced, clear and monitorable efficiency requirements are essential to be agreed across the industry to enable meaningful change in the sector and to improve the safety standards afforded to those who reside in high-risk buildings. Compliance, efficiency and safety are at the core of our association and we urge the industry to work together to provide a competency determination solution that takes into account our five core principles. ”NAPIT are active participants in the Competency Steering Group 2 Working Group; installation workers, and MHCLG is leading the review of the minimum technical competency. For complete graphic information, please click here.